This tweet is a good example of how some people excuse inaccuracies as “feuds” when the inaccuracies are about someone they do not like.https://twitter.com/heerjeet/status/989136562121203712 …
-
-
A - I don’t believe that. Sorry. B- the issue here is the inaccuracies not the “feud.” Unless you are arguing that Chozick deliberately made errors because of the “feud.”
-
Also this is larger than the Times and Clintons. It’s also reflective of the stream of smears from the Left that just keeps getting handed down as well.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But you apparently don't like her mother or father.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Blocking your ass
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wait, why,
@HeerJeet ? I have voted for the Clintons in every general election for which they ran & for which I've been old enough to vote, but I think Chelsea was a net negative in 2016 (her "Bernie wants to destroy Medicare" especially bad). -
Also just seems like her career, such as it is, is a great example of nepotism among the 0.01% (and even worse, bc her particular brand of nepotism is based on political connections, not *just* money). E.g., Goldman Sacs CEO investing in her husband's failing hedge fund.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
She’s on Twitter. You can tell her directly, right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your audience, by and large, does not, as I’m sure you’re aware
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.