2. The origins of the feud are lost in the mists of time but basically Clintonites think Times has an institutional bias against them (Whitewater, Clinton Cash, email coverage) & Times people think Clintons are ... a bit touchy (to put it politely).
-
-
Show this thread
-
3. Some history of the feud and its consequences:https://newrepublic.com/article/148119/clintons-new-york-times-cant-get-along …
Show this thread -
4. (Incidentally, the freakout of the Clintonites over these very innocent tweets -- see my mentions -- shows how traumatic the whole subject of the New York Times is for them).
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Quarrel" is a really poor way to frame a subject of a book claiming things said about her therein are not true and the author never contacted her to check
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
On the next episode of "Jeet says something stupid"....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's the subject of a book claiming false reporting. That's not a feud. one of them is lying.
-
If only we had a vast army of reporters who could look into this.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
A reporter got the facts wrong and apparently never bothered to check. This is not the Hatfields and McCoys.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
at least he won't be doxxed the way the rest of us are when we are critical of St. Bernie or the MAGA freaks. (shrug)
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.