1. This @DouthatNYT column tries to do something valuable (distinguish between reasonable anti-abortion case & Williamsonian bloodthirsty desire for retribution) but it's far too short & raises more questions than it answers.
-
-
6. Also, the historical record is that contemporary regimes that adopt anti-abortion policies do end up extremely punitive. El Salvador is a prime example.
Show this thread -
7. Anyways, I'd like to see
@DouthatNYT try & explain the mechanics of how his position works, perhaps ideally in debate with someone versed in the history & policies (like@KathaPollitt).Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He simply says out loud what they all silently believe.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Worth noting that Williamson’s absurdum seems to equally validate (or encourage) killing any doctors performing abortions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Bible’s about a spirit who creates people so that they’ll behave the way it likes, enables them to choose to do otherwise, then damns them for doing so. Believing choosers are created at conception and that the spirit wants people to destroy chooser-killers ... fits fine.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.