As I've said before, focus on pundits ignores fact that heart of journalism is reporters. National Review has done a good job of grooming reporters who go on to work for MSM (Costa, Alberta, Woodruff). We need more of that.
I'm on record as saying that National Review is better now than it has been in decades.
-
-
That's different than saying it's a fine magazine.
-
Well, the two statements are compatible and both are true. I think it's a fine magazine & better than it has been in decades (probably last period it was this strong was 1960s).
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.