In what meaningful ways can existing actual IQ science help public policy? If it can't, there's no reason for most liberals or non-scientists to care.
-
-
That doesn't mean it takes. A lot of the time, people hedge, and use language that suggests causality without really saying the word. Or they draw conclusions that would only be warranted if their estimates were causal, even though they have not established that.
-
PS: Please don't take time away from a Jack Kirby book to respond to me.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This then is the nub of our disagreement. I think that almost all just-controlling research designs fail. I am with David Freedman on the value of OLS for causal inference. In a version Jeet might like because of all the old-timey characters: https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~census/521.pdf
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.