1. National Review is complaining the concept of white supremacy is empty. Okay, let's try to cite a few examples to clarify. National Review 1957: "the White community is...for the time being ... the advanced race." https://adamgomez.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/whythesouthmustprevail-1957.pdf …
-
-
Perhaps. On the other hand, to what extent is person B responsible for ideas promulgated by person A 30 or 40 or 60 years ago just because A and B have received payment from the same entity?
-
Not responsible at all except in the sense that a magazine has an identity or profile. Like Edmund Burke said, society is partnership of living, dead & those unborn.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Let me get this straight: So you credit yourself for grappling with what you take to be TNR's history over 20 years after the fact. But not Buckley, who himself retracted that editorial within less than a handful of years of writing it?
-
Buckley's retraction is offset but really terrible stuff magazine continued to publish for decades after (for example 1963 church bombing editorial).
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.