Can someone at National Review ask Kevin Williamson to respond to this (it looks like he's off twitter). https://twitter.com/MattBruenig/status/964915654385197056 …
-
-
I mean... Can you blame them? Most of them are incredibly bad writers and sloppy thinkers
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You should hear how they talk, always authoritatively, about Marx.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nozick is weird because this isn’t an isolated phenomenon. They treat his work as a response to Rawls’ theories, which is accurate, but don’t realize he’s treating Rawls’ theories as accurate. It’s a material debate that classic lib/libertarians treat as purely metaphysical.
-
It’s a phenomenon with a pretty common theme: it’s all perpetuated by people who like to pretend Marx never existed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Did you just write that only the Bruenigs have read the texts? I’m embarrassed for you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Right wingers been citing canonical classics they've never bothered to read for some time now. The Bible (for instance), clearly goes unread by the vast majority of Christians (both Dem & Rep). And yes I just suggested that Dems are ALSO right wingers. Fucking @ me!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I suspect that you have read Nozick & you aren't a Bruenig. I certainly read Anarchy State and Utopia (and didn't get the point or a firm impression that there is one). I'm a moderate leftist not a Bruenig.
-
I feel like this is kind of beside the point? Nozick is not exactly holy writ. I don't think that "What Would Nozick Say?" is a reasonable principle of justice.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.