If O.J. Simpson is in fact a murderer, he appears to have acted on his evil homicidal impulses on exactly one occasion. Compare that to Stalin....
-
-
Then your murder analogy makes no sense ... your definition of pedophile relates to attraction, not action ... if it was consistent, everyone who's struck by murderous tendencies would be a murderer, even if they've never acted on those tendencies.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Fair enough. But it doesn’t negate my point. The writer probably thought, as I did, as most people probably do, that pedophiles have a high rate of recidivism.
-
love too talk out of my ass on the op ed page of the New York Times
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But OJ beat Nicole several times, I'm sure most abusers never go on to murder those they abuse. See how that works?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He only allegedly abused his daughter once. What about his being married to his step-daughter? Or his girlfriend in one of his first movies is still in high school (i think manhattan, but maybe annie hall). This argument is factually flawed even if it wasn’t already wrong
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly, there’s holes all in your rhetoric Jeet. And the stats do show that pedophile’s who act on their impulses usually do so at the culmination of an escalation pattern. Prosecutors use evidence of that pattern to convict. No evidence of such a pattern with WA over decades
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.