can someone also ask them why they think a man who was clearly lying and distorting about climate change wouldn't indulge in the same behaviors for another issue?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hypothesis: The New York Times has been replaced by a bot that encourages people to subscribe to the Washington Post
-
worked for me!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Silly liberal. Don't you know that "social media standards" only apply to criticism of Republicans?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's OK If You're Not A Libtard
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@nytimes.@HeerJeet has questions for you: Are you comfortable with editorial staff calling someone profane names in the course of civil discussion? What about calling someone a terrorist who is not actually one? Since#climatedenial isn't your line in the sand, is this?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
we need opinions on all sides, even the ones that are unscientific and dishonest-- nytimes.
-
Except for the slander that we (the NYT) overemphasized Hillary's server. On that WE WILL NOT RELENT!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
nyt should do away with both their draconian social media standards and bret's op-eds in one fell swoop
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Considering how ridiculously thin-skinned many NYT writers and reporters have been lately on Twitter, I'd say this comports perfectly with their standards. ...you didn't say they were necessarily high standards, Jeet.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.