Erickson has usefully turned subtext into text. Many evangelicals like him do think liberal Protestantism is Satanic, but are usually to cagey to be explicit. https://twitter.com/EWErickson/status/944601917405188096 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
Wait until you hear what *this* guy saidhttp://www.usccb.org/bible/matthew/18:6 …
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @baseballcrank
I like how you can't appreciate that there is a difference between Jesus and Erick Erickson.
2 replies 5 retweets 67 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
I realize your point, to the extent you have one besides momentary convenience, is to delegitimize the use of religious language in religious debate, but there's a reason the harshest language in the Gospels aims at false teachers. see also http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/_P80.HTM …
5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @baseballcrank
It's particularly dishonest to cite Vatican since Rachel Held Evans point (that Bible requires exegesis) is Church teaching.
8:04 AM - 29 Dec 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.