Stalker. Solaris is great but the special effects do not hold up well on the big screen.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lol only 6 bothered to vote
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The answer is both. If they're 35mm prints definitely STALKER. If it's digital projection it could go either way.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Andrei Rubilev
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You should see the mash-up of the two: Stalkaris. It makes no sense but the visuals are a-MAZ-ing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Add "None of the Above unless you need a nap" and the decision will be clear. (Stalker, if you must. Solaris is longer than the book.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The answer is both.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Stalker is great, a little bit longer & really not quite as good as Solaris, if that helps ~ guy who saw both on big screen about 25 yrs ago, read Lem & the Strugatskys, doesn't remember Stalker nearly as well as Solaris.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
stalker and its not even close. Its his masterpiece and needs to be viewed today as we are all living in the zone now
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.