Honestly that NYT piece is great because what it shows is distressing. And I’m embarrassed for people going online and saying “It should be an explainer that shows how admiration of Hitler correlates with violence and civilizational calamity.” You should know that by now.
-
-
People’s interest in them seems bottomless. I always thought there were too many basic cable “exposes” of the same in the 90s. Maybe not.
-
Stories about Nazis get clicks but I think responsible position is 1) self-professed Nazis very few in number 2) broader American racism is much more common & distinct from Nazism.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Different breed. Fewer swatika neck tattoos.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The point is that the NYT are, sort of, realizing/acknowledging begrudgingly that this time it is different. This rising group are different sociologically and ideologically from past white supremacists. Denying this forever becomes stale and irrelevant at some point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.