We seem to be doing just fine without them.
-
-
-
Incorrect
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Where is Peter Thiel when Roy Moore needs him? .... so much
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And it was destroyed for publishing a story that was true--it wasn't a defamation case.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Jezebel did too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We could sure use them now. The only outlet whose M.O. understood and challenged celebrity power.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To be fair, they destroyed themselves.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He'd prefer to have his head in the sand.
-
probably a perv too
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Gawker also went too far. They were scummy in themselves. So it was pretty much the blind leading the blind.
-
This. Gawker was fucking scum. If you blow up an entire city, you're going to kill some bad people along the way by coincidence. That was Gawker's approach.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.