1. Winning wars requires this, not starting them. 2. Nuclear works for him.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
*Winning a war
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hahahahahahaha
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, winning a war required that. Starting a war doesn't.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
there will be war criminals that won't deal with any of the consequences because that never happens in this country.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Arguably that’s what the Joint Chiefs are for.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It really doesn't. "Go drop a bunch of bombs on those losers!" "Yessir!" "Did it work?" "Well ..." "Goddammit! Do it again! More!" Et viola.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. I see the military has killed more civilians in the last 10 months than were killed in 8 years under Obama. Only helps terrorism grow.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think the Pentagon is probably pretty untouched by WH chaos. (Far less than State, for example.)
-
You know Bannon has his fingers crossed for a terrorist attack
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.