Hm. I've never heard a Canadian Jewish politician asked, simply because they are Jewish, their stance on Ben-Gurion, Begin, Dayan. Have you?
-
-
1. Your error lies in "simply because they're Jewish," which assumes what's at issue - that Singh was asked simply because he's Sikh...
2 replies 1 retweet 15 likes -
2. ... as though only an anti-Sikh racist would expect him to condemn a mass-murderer of brown people, including many Sikhs.
2 replies 2 retweets 12 likes -
3. That's absurd. Politicians everywhere get asked about controversial positions. Harper & niqab. Trump & race. Corbyn & Hamas, IRA.
2 replies 3 retweets 16 likes -
4. Singh accuses India of genocide. He fought for clemency for a terrorist who blew up a Sikh politician & 17 innocent bystanders.
5 replies 11 retweets 18 likes -
5. These hardline positions invite the question how hardline he is. Turns out he won't condemn martyr posters for a mass-murderer.
5 replies 4 retweets 22 likes -
6. That clearly interests viewers, which is our job. Same Q was put to white politicians turning a blind eye to martyr posters.
2 replies 1 retweet 16 likes -
7. So how is it "racist" to ask if glorifying a mass-murderer (of mostly brown people and many Sikhs) is OK?
2 replies 5 retweets 14 likes -
8. Or do you actually believe that the question could not possibly arise "simply because" it's bad to glorify a mass-murderer?
4 replies 2 retweets 15 likes
If Terry wants to ask Trudeau or Brown why they turn a blind eye to Modi's horrific human rights record, it would show genuine balance.
-
-
You understate my crimes. There are actually millions of important interviews to which I have never been assigned and never will be.
1 reply 2 retweets 16 likes -
This whole bash-Milewski thread is whataboutery on crack.
0 replies 2 retweets 27 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.