1. I have a few thoughts on the political economy of Playboy (vis a vis the Golden Age of American capitalism & baby boom).
-
-
10. Post Affluent Society, Playboy persists but it's no longer aspirational (who can afford lifestyle?). Rather it is nostalgic.
Show this thread -
11. This is a crucial point: the fantasy is not just enjoying the Playboy lifestyle but being envied for doing so: https://twitter.com/trash__fire/status/913791334405824512 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
12. One of the reasons to revisit Ehrenreich's great 1983 book is she makes clear that Hefner's project was a consciously capitalist onepic.twitter.com/nrUkYDnwai
Show this thread -
13. It's not just Hefner wanted to make money (duh!) but that he believed (correctly!) Playboy lifestyle would bolster capitalist system
Show this thread -
14. Industrial capitalism merely colonized the physical world. Hefner was one of the pioneers of colonizing the dream life of humanity.
Show this thread -
15. More thoughts on Hefner, Ehrenreich, and Playboy's place in history:https://newrepublic.com/article/145097/hugh-hefners-incomplete-sexual-revolution …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is just wrong. Simply and clearly. http://time.com/4923536/the-deuce-hbo-pornography-history/ … You are projecting an economic understanding on pornography that isn't there
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
20-something Boomers didn't buy Playboy like men of their age in early cohorts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
also just before the widespread adoption of home VHS. Like radio and comic books before them, men's magazines were felled by TV.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.