You don't need the word "book" in that tweet.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
At least print-on-demand has a sort of charming naivety to this sort of bad design. From professional publishers, it just looks sloppy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this is what happens when you tell people not to judge books by their covers, people think they don't matter.
-
Insidious lie, that
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why, what could have led to such a discovery?

-
I'm trying to subtweet here!
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Give me a good quality paper and a holdable size over cover design any day
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm not hung up on the jackets, but I'm a fiend for LOA, Everyman's Library, and Folio Society.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It would be a shame to spend $33 on stock art, right? http://www.istockphoto.com/photo/chemists-work-on-project-in-lab-gm610976810-105040369 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Turns out there weren't enough black scientists to fill up a book cover.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.