The Nation magazine needs to do some housecleaning on how its covering the Russia story:https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2017/09/01/the-nation-issues-editors-note-on-story-questioning-whether-the-dnc-was-hacked/?utm_term=.277616964a9a …
-
-
Kudos to
@KathaPollitt &@BobDreyfuss2017 for taking a brave stance against their own magazine on this.Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Soooo... arguing Russians hacked the DNC based on no evidence is NOT a conspiracy theory?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There was a conspiracy, so why be critical of reporting the facts. Russia story is the conspiracy theory without facts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Stephen Cohen has had a peculiar affection for Putin for many years.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Conspiracies do happen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lawrence shouldn't have asserted the insider theory as fact, but why would that be "conspiracy thinking" & "Russia did it" not be?
-
The follow-ups urge caution about accepting theories without hard evidence, which is consistent with what some of us have urged all along.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
what, exactly, was the "conspiracy thinking"? And you just assumed it was a hack, not a leak, the fact very much shown to be in dispute
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.