This is almost obscene. The election results back up that Trump on racism was no different than Clinton's way on racism? That's Alt Left.https://twitter.com/heerjeet/status/896801565683482624 …
-
-
Wasn't enough to win *whites* where racism was motivational. It was a white wave election.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Haha. J: The sky is green. A: You're saying the sky is green? J: No, I'm saying soy milk tastes like cardboard.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So she shouldn't have spoken up against his racism? Her whole campaign was a rebuke of trump's message of white supremacy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They didn't just focus on his personality. They focused on his rallies, his law and order rhetoric, his racist advisors. I mean c'mon Jeet.
-
that still falls under the purview of "appearance and decorum" not policy.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
HRC got 66 million votes, more than any white man in history. When you design and run a campaign that gets more, I might listen to you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
HRC focused on Trump because that's only time she got coverage. She could've talked about her Econ policy until blue in face, no1 listened.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The falsehood that HRC was focused on "personality" - when she was highlighting policy implications of his views/values - needs to stop.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You need to stop coming up with these shitty takes man.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.