1. Russia collusion investigation poses problems for Trump & GOP, obviously, but also for Democrats, liberals & left.
-
-
Trying to appeal to Greenwald, are we?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Boxed" democrats have been hawkish since 2002 except for the 2004 pres campaign
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is stronger cyber security a hawkish position?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wouldn't advocate war with Russia, but standing up to Putin doesn't seem like a bad idea
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
3.
@ggreenwald has been alert to way neo-cons & other hawks are using Russia to rehabilitate themselves https://theintercept.com/2017/07/17/with-new-d-c-policy-group-dems-continue-to-rehabilitate-and-unify-with-bush-era-neocons/ … -
lol Greenwald "alert."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Only if they appeal to the dumbest of the populace. Most Dems acknowledge it's about stopping interference and backing NATO.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why? Simply being anti-collusion, anti-mony laundering, pro-specific sanctions, and anti-Assad...that means Dems have to be hawkish?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Putin represents the interests of himself and other oligarchs. Hawkish on Putin, yes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I understand, but given their interference in our election shouldn't we take an aggressive stance in our policy towards Russia specifically?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.