2. The danger for Democrats is by going all in on Russia story they'll be boxed into a hawkish foreign policy https://twitter.com/SohrabAhmari/status/889357890099826689 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Trying to appeal to Greenwald, are we?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
For whom doesn’t it present a problem?!?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Putin's Russia attacked us to install an Authoritarian in early dementia with dreams of Fascism. Putin's Russia can go F itself.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nobody sane wants nuclear war, but we cannot allow Russia to decide who our president is or to manipulate our political process.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Really? Sanctions, beefed up cyber security, strengthening NATO...I guess that's semi-hawkish? We're not going to invade Russia
-
you can't assume that US has total freedom of action against Russia. Russia has levers too including nukes. Better to appease them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We're not going to war with Russia, and we sure as shit aren't going to just sit here and let him run our government.
-
Obama had a diplomatic relationship with Russia. An uneasy 1, but a diplomatic 1. Hillary would have had same. Nuclear war is fearmongering.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
IMO, it's okay to be pragmatically hawkish in reference to Russia/Putin. Doesn't mean you have to be hawkish overall.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.