A real question: has anyone attacked Nancy MacLean's book who isn't a direct or indirect recipient of Koch money?
-
-
It’s just not a good book. In contrast, I think that Jane Mayer’s book on the Kochs is first rate. It’s not that it’s critical - lots there
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
to criticize. I still remember the time that Charles Rowley suggested that Obamacare merited watering the tree of liberty with BHO’s blood
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
http://crookedtimber.org/2010/01/13/this-joke-isnt-funny-anymore/ … It’s that MacLean thinks she has found the Key to All Rightwing Mythologies in the work of James Buchanan, and
-
Nancy is a friend but I haven't read the book yet. This critique is better than many I've seen in that it addresses the book's argument.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
that she seems to have lost sight of what arguments her evidence might reasonably support, in ways that e.g. Mayer has not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.