I think they want to not lose.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's almost like "the Party" is a diverse group of people with different views, goals, and ideas.
-
And this says nada about the relative strength of said factions. Rockefeller Repubs and New Right both existed in 1994; they were NOT equal.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
"Win" in this case only means keeping the donations coming in and the bonuses going to the Party Bosses.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Neither. Can. I. I can't count how many angry tweets I've seen ending with the innumerate statement "the Democratic Party is fine"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
$23 million to Ossoff, a district in which Dems have never been competitive is not evidence of a desire to win? High turnout generally?
-
The things you mentioned are a result of voters/constituency, NOT party architecture
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
"the party" got its hand-picked candidate and virtually unlimited amounts of money in the last election. how'd that go?
-
So did "the base".
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They would very much like to keep their jobs, or failing that, get well paying jobs in a similar sector
-
Also they would like to not have to see the world any other way than the one they're accustomed to seeing it since 1992
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.