Tenuous. Would have to prove actual damages.
-
-
-
an accusation of a crime is slander per se, isn't it? I would think the constitutional actual malice standard would be the harder part.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
it would be hilarious if Trump is ultimately impeached for libel
-
That's not how impeachment works
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think you have to prove damages as well, hard to say what Trump's statements will actually cost Comey. He could try, though.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting legal question. Comey would have to prove he isnt a public figure. Pretty difficult imo.
-
If not, then you have to prove malice which would be harder.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Plame tried to sue Cheney but was denied.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Doubtful. Comey is a public figure. The opinion is a matter of public importance. Actual malice standard is a high hurdle. I wish he could.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't believe the president can be sued for slander while he is in office. After that, game on.
-
Critical question, per Nixon v Fitzgerald, is whether tweeting personal commentary is within "outer perimeter of his duties of office"
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.