Running an anti-Semite as your candidate? Getting Donald Trump to appear publicly with your opponent? Or multi-party system? or being a man?https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/873000231767494657 …
-
-
This is the "no warming since 1998" of political science arguments
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't think "since 2008" can exactly be seen as enough data points for a trend...
-
Hard to disentangle from economics. Dems and Obama gained hugely from GOP totally driving country into ditch under Bush.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I mean, yes, obviously, let's set the baseline to 2008 and not say 2004. Wouldn't want to mess up a narrative.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Fun with arbitrary end points. You should write hacky baseball articles!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Voter suppression says hi. I'd expect Mike Tracey to totally ignore this. Not you, jeet
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This doesn't take into account the jolt Brexit and the horror of Trump sent thru electoral systems everywhere. Sadly not retroactive
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Almost like the party in power tends to lose votes, from a high water mark when they were out of power. But that couldn't be it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Difference is that Dems lost support as expected after years in power (should have lost pop vote) labour gained after years out of power
-
Labour should have been cons
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.