This is worth reading help understand how an important wing of the Dems think, but I strongly disagree.https://twitter.com/politico/status/870219637396582401 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Plus Romney voters turned out to be partisan tax cut hunters when the chips were down. Fell in line for Trump in a big way.
Nothing you predicted about 2016 was correct. Anyone can make banal claims with hindsight. You have zero forward looking insight. Zero.
To be fair, the Clinton coalition is impressive in many ways: almost as many as Obama 2012, very strong in Texas & Georgia.
And there are some districts where Clinton coalition can help Dems break new ground: GA-6 looks like it could well be one.
And Bernie was popular in Trump country. Or much more so than Hillary anyway
Is it though? Some people who took a chance on Trump might not be willing to take him for another term.
Which I think can win both WWC and affluent suburban voters for a landslide coalition.
We need to focus on 1/2 the country that didn't vote. Ignoring 66 million that voted for Clinton is stupid.That is the heart of the party.
We also need to focus on the people who WANTED to vote but were disenfranchised from doing so.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.