Christie Blatchford's argue that Natives criticizing cultural appropriation are worse then dictators or ISIS. Bold: http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/christie-blatchford-in-defence-of-the-cbcs-steve-ladurantaye-from-a-fellow-sinner …
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
You might think I'm exaggerating but, no, Blatchford says she rather have Charlie Hebdo style massacres (12 dead) than Native criticism.pic.twitter.com/zVMn7ADemC
18 replies 129 retweets 154 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Worth noting that although ostensibly pro-free-speech, Blatchford's column is actual anti-free speech of Natives. She wants them to STFU.
8 replies 93 retweets 239 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Blatchford says she's not against criticism of journalists, only criticism that leads to "systemic reform." Really!pic.twitter.com/LrgbL0RFBJ
7 replies 44 retweets 110 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Blatchford's position: you shouldn't criticize journalists if that leads to actual change in journalistic practice. That's anti-free speech
6 replies 48 retweets 132 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
This is garbage & you know it. Her beef isn't w criticism but with firing and forced re-education. Criticism is one thing, firing another.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
So criticism is okay as long as it leads to no real change. Which means criticism is not okay.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.