Christie Blatchford's argue that Natives criticizing cultural appropriation are worse then dictators or ISIS. Bold: http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/christie-blatchford-in-defence-of-the-cbcs-steve-ladurantaye-from-a-fellow-sinner …
-
-
That's what the "free speech" defense is. It's not for your free speech, it's for you to zip up and listen to exclusively mine. Sickening.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She's putting the wind in racist windbag.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Blatchford says she's not against criticism of journalists, only criticism that leads to "systemic reform." Really!pic.twitter.com/LrgbL0RFBJ
-
Isn't that the point?!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Anyone who makes a "free speech" argument is most of the time very anti-free speech of others.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It cannot be considered a good thing for public discourse to be ruled by the hecklers' veto, by whoever yells Hater first & loudest.
-
Powerful columnists telling Natives to STFU is the real hecklers veto.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
My sense is journalists feel their profession, i.e. their class position, is threatened from above and below; some choose to punch down.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It was never about free speech in the first place - it's culture theft.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.