People would be less inspired to read the essay I'm linking to if I said "here are some brain farts on X" or "here are some blurbs for X"
-
-
-
Replying to @christapeterso
At magazine we work for, we've consistently found that twitter threads + link get more readers than "great essay" + link
1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
I agree it is better to have a thread. Like "I'm still thinking about Robin Ganev's essay..." and then what you said, for example.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @christapeterso
Disagree. If you mention essay in first tweet it turns readers off. You need appetizer before meal. That's based on doing many of these
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
"Robin Ganev had some great thoughts about the nativist bias in THT."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @christapeterso
That's virtually the same as my tweet #6. I put it at the end for a reason, which is to send reader, after appetizer, to essay.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
You called someone's thoughts your own and then credited them later. That's weird, right?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @christapeterso
I think you are thinking of "thoughts" in academic sense (original contribution to knowledge) & not vernacular one (brain farts).
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
I'm thinking of the kind of thing the tweets being introduced express.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I think readers make distinction between the relative weight of casual musings (tweets) and considered thoughts (essay linked to)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.