oooooh
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes please.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2. Atwood's novel bracingly feminist dystopian satire but every now & then conservatives (
@DouthatNYT, Federalist) try to appropriate. Why? -
3. Writing in The Walrus,
@RobinGanev shrewdly links Atwood's portrayal of infertility with natalist 1950s psychology. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
No, that's very relevant.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Whaaaaaat? It's antinatalist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Children of Men is the natalist Bible--and homophobic to boot!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I've also wondered: Did Atwood ever read Heinlein's "If This Goes On…" then set out to write woman-centered version of the story premise?
-
An inferior woman-centred version!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.