4. You can believe (as I do) that Kay improved magazine and also be concerned that he had many quarrels with freelancers.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
5. Key problem all along is Walrus is mainstream magazine & Kay is right wing provocateur. Imagine Ann Coulter editing Atlantic Monthly.
19 replies 13 retweets 67 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
6. so, if you write about Walrus story as "PC run amok" or "free speech under threat" you are doing it wrong.
2 replies 17 retweets 51 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
7. Since people have objected to Ann Coulter at Atlantic Monthly let's say: imagine Fred Barnes editing The New Yorker.
5 replies 4 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Honestly: I've enjoyed your writing for ages but this analogy is so egregiously wrong that it calls into question everything you've written.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FeldmanAdam
The Fred Barnes analogy or the Ann Coulter one?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Kay is skeptical of certain kinds of virtuous groupthink, but he is not that kind of gleeful-hateful provocateur. It's an inapt comparison.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FeldmanAdam
I'd say his writing on Native issues is very extreme, their radicalness hidden perhaps by his reasonable tone.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet @FeldmanAdam
But I understand why some people find analogy far-fetched, which is why I why I rescinded it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Hadn't seen the rescinding, but Kay's thinking on many (most?) issues has changed enormously since 2001, when he wrote the article you cite.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm not so sure it has changed on the Native issue -- or at least I haven't seen evidence of such a change. More change elsewhere.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.