1. On the Bret Stephens issue, the problem is he's supposed to bring ideological diversity to NY Times & he really doesn't. https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/858098429163163653 …
-
-
NYT idea of a conservative columnist is like what they said about Al Gore being an old person's idea of a young person
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Curious- where does Krugman rate these days?
-
Clinton Democrat
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Stephens = Douthat - Catholicism + smug self-regard.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
6. Brooks & Stephens in particular are in pretty much agreement on all issues. Brooks is a better writer & less willing to lie about climate
-
Better? Maybe. Not good though.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It solidifies the Times' position as an establishment platform capable of both tut-tutting the President and admonishing the Left
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn't it time to focus more on the low quality (Somebody was overly certain so noone can know anything) than the point of view?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the intellectual disease of bothsidesism is something they actively promotepic.twitter.com/6NC13CFAnA
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nothing, except maybe a few more ads destined to WSJ. Increases appeal to Jewish Republicans.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.