would be awful if true. reading the actual article, the claim is egregiously falsehttps://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/856996113420763136 …
-
-
Replying to @AkivaMCohen
"most of them were slaughtered by the Nazis. But otherwise..." Consider the function of the words "but otherwise"
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
the article doesn't defend Horthy (to a Jewish audience, "he only killed some jews" isn't a defence) except to say he's not as one- note ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AkivaMCohen @HeerJeet
a monster as Hitler was (again, not a hard bar to clear); main point was Vitezi Rend as an organization cut across pro/anti nazi members
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AkivaMCohen @HeerJeet
and therefore shouldn't be defined as a "pro-nazi" organization. it's an argument, but not in any way a defense of antisemites or nazis
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AkivaMCohen
It's a spurious argument that vastly understates collaborationist role & anti-Semitic ideology of Vitezi Rend
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
I'm in no position to evaluate it. just the claim tablet is defending Horthy
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The article minimized Horthy's culpability in ways that read like an apologia.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.