1. Since @ggreenwald has asked me for a Mea Culpa for 2016 election, I have to oblige.https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/856143736895655936 …
-
-
12. To extend media covered Trump's terribleness, they felt they needed to "balance" it with critique of Clinton. Hence overplay of emails.
-
Mustn't violate the rule of don't take a side
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nate Silver made a good point about this. He used the romney scale for scandal. BO and Mitt were 1, HRC a 8, DJT 50. Saying HRC = BO is :(
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She was all those things--including corrupt. She was waaay more polished/careful about it.
-
Minus the misogyny perhaps. Bigger point: the Neolib brand of racism trades in phrases like "inclusion in the military" while bombing the+
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Clinton was not more flawed than Obama. Delete your account.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Saying Clinton is no more flawed then romney or obama is incredibly disengenious and deserves its own mea culpa
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No one liked her and her neoliberal hawk policies aren't viable anymore. That's just The truth of it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The fact that you use the word "flawed" when it only comes to Clinton w/ an aside for others does not tell you anything?
-
GG asked about HRC, not other candidates, that's what Heer was answering & yet he still mentioned similar methods worked against Jeb!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.