1. I'm glad Nate Silver & others are bringing this up again because it was a crucial dynamic.https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/855798244173115392 …
-
-
Dems are better at weeding out primary challengers
-
That's because GOPers run in order to grift--"campaign" sells their books, shows, PAC slush funds. Dem can't get rich running & losing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not on the Democratic side. Trump had one advantage over Rubio & Co. He had 100% name ID, or as close as one can get.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They never actually united against him and took action though until it was way too late
-
He had to be stopped in New Hampshire
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They also had, what, 13 candidates? Think that was a bigger factor for Trump than establishment GOP.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
GOP does not have Super Delegates like the Dems ,
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hardly means the same thing given how crowded Republican field was surely? "Against Trump" isn't as consolidated as "for Hillary"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1 strong outsider vs 10+ fighting for the rest, easy to see why he could win
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.