1. Democrats need to do an autopsy on 2016, unfortunately most postmortems have devolved into the "Was Hillary bad?" question
-
-
3. Let's realize the politically we're in a post-Clinton world:https://newrepublic.com/article/142119/stop-obsessing-hillary-clinton-its-pointless …
-
In contrast, however, discussing the misogyny underlying the "was Hillary bad?" question is essential for politics going forward.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The culture of the party and DNC that led them to totally ignore or misunderstand her weaknesses is important to analyze
-
And it isn't possible to do that without also talking about those weaknesses, which requires talking about her
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
People should discuss advisability of running much younger candidate. Warren and Sanders too old.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
On the other hand, interference by the FBI and Russian espionage remain a relevant concern
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How do you perform a post-mortem with no body to examine?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She was flawed, but we need to move on.
-
H NOT flawed. She was exceptional by any measure. MSM, which promoted lame message was flawed. &U2pic.twitter.com/fCRI9SSc9l
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They may shine light on possible weaknesses of other centrists / other establishment candidates / in one case, other Clintons
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.