1. One analytical confusion people are falling into is applying normal foreign policy categories to Trump.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
2. "Will Trump be an isolationist? Or will he follow neo-con path? Is there a Trump doctrine?" All these are nonsensical questions.
4 replies 48 retweets 103 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
3. Trump's "policy" is inciting chaos in the service of self-promotion. So it doesn't follow any larger category than that.
5 replies 97 retweets 189 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
4. Trying to define Trump's "foreign policy" is like trying to figure out the Joker's business plan. The plan is chaos, chaos is the plan.
4 replies 113 retweets 233 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
5. Even if you agree with a specific Trump action (as some did with bombing Syria) you can't extrapolate a coherent policy from it.
4 replies 32 retweets 95 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
6. Bannonism is a semi-coherent doctrine (although weak on implementation); neo-cons have coherent doctrine. Trump is just impulse & whim
5 replies 20 retweets 85 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
7. Here's my larger analysis of this:https://newrepublic.com/article/141942/trumps-confused-presidency-will-endanger-world …
4 replies 56 retweets 87 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Can I just say that you're one of the best at what to tweetstorm and what to make into an article (and how to connect those two things)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Thanks! I'm glad someone notices that I try to use the two forms differently.
-
-
we notice!!!!
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
also love the Joe Ollmann profile pic
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.