Yeah, we don't think of science as being political because in the past both parties agreed that science actually worked.
-
-
-
The results of science aren't supposed to be determined by politics, however it's entirely possible that the results can oppose or support-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
To take it even further: A March for Science is political because: -A march is by necessity political. -Science itself is political.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is a political statement: since science is the most reliable way to understand the world, it should be used to craft policy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't you get all Thomas Kuhn at us. I'll go Feyerabend, I swear,pic.twitter.com/ECZqKYE2Vg
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Negligent is putting it politely. Now's a good time for scientists to take note of who is and isn't willing to defend the institution.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I think it's more about recognizing it takes enormous time and effort to build political environments that offer support without patronage
- Show replies
-
-
-
it's this insane (and totally evidence-free) belief that simply stating the facts will, somehow, lead to the correct policy outcomes
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.