1. The Democrats have a real problem on Gorsuch and obstructionism going forward.
-
-
What do you say to idea that crossing of party-lines was the 2nd-half-of-20th-century exception to a more polarized, obstructionist rule?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They will lose even more catastrophically by capitulation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You aren't wrong, but the strong implication of your thread is it's somehow the Democrats' responsibility to fix what the Republicans broke.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ending the filibuster would make American politics more functional in the long run. Now it's win win for Dems: no filibuster or no Gorsuch.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Jeet your piece is thoroughly unconvincing. Have big respect for your thinking generally but not here. I think I'll write a response.
-
Please do!
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Dems cannot spend the rest of our lives waiting for GOPers to reach out and grasp our out-held hands. No path to less partinsanship now.
-
If in future some path appears, rules can be reinstated. That's not a great answer, but best possible now.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Ironically, a solution (return to normal) may be in obstructionism. Forcing R's to drop 60 vote threshold and get back to majority rule
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Until both sides feel the pain, there won't be any momentum for reform.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.