Here's the deal: If such evidence existed we'd of heard of it long ago. Certainly soon enough to save Hillary.https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/838244198675468289 …
-
-
Replying to @RocksEm
That's like saying "If Watergate were true, it would've emerged before 1972 election." Investigations take time.
1 reply 2 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
It would have emerged if a democrat was in office in 1971. It only took so long because of stonewalling by Nixon.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RocksEm
Democrats were in office in 1968 but Nixon's covert dealings with South Vietnam note revealed till much later.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
That's because Johnson had his own ass to cover. Outing Nixon then would have outed Johnson. Mutual Assured Destruction.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RocksEm
Right, meaning that revelation of factually true story can be delayed for extraneous political reasons.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Yes, Obama had no reason to hold back on Trump. Heck, he was actively trying to, at the very least, wire tap Trump.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RocksEm
Not Obama, but intelligence community. And they might hold back if they have assets to protect. Do that all the time.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
We aren't talking about foreign surveillance and spies here. Evidence would come direct from Trump people actions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Um, much of the evidence does seem to be from foreign surveillance and spies. You don't seem to be familiar with basic facts.
-
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.