1. Good for Harward. This is a question I've changed my mind on: whether good people should work for Trump.https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/832426644749086722 …
-
-
Does that mean he should have rejected job regardless of staffing and if answering only to Trump?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not only enable him, but be tainted by associating with him.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the only reason is to report/leak on the worst actions. No one should have to do that..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
4. Congressional GOP enabling Trump but no reason for national security experts to do so. Make message clear: this is unacceptable.
-
5. Anyone offered NSC job should say, "I'll take it only if Bannon is gone or sidelined." Otherwise job is not worth it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Not as long as Bannon has T's ear, I would guess. Peel Bannon, maybe Miller away, and rational people have a shot, maybe?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
May be difference between those in WH and those heading departments. Mattis still seems (comparative) voice of sanity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yep I had a hard line on this from start. Was clear from campaign wld be cult of personality-world and thus dysfunctional
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this was my position all along: the fanatics in 45's Admin would ALWAYS outnumber the voices of reason
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm torn. Not sure either way. Are we going to give up on the next 4 years? I still believe Mattis and Rex r a positive influence
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.