1. Good for Harward. This is a question I've changed my mind on: whether good people should work for Trump.https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/832426644749086722 …
-
-
3. But three weeks in,it's clear that subordinates not in position to mitigate or block Trump. They can only enable him.
-
Does that mean he should have rejected job regardless of staffing and if answering only to Trump?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But doing decent, competent, mitigating things will just get them fired.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
wishful thinking.
#ResistThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I read this early, and believe it. Still do: https://www.justsecurity.org/34404/case-serving-trump/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good people are only used for protective cover for the bad guys. "How bad can he be when he's got Joe Blow working for him?"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.