A) more members, some selected by judges from the bench. B) set terms and rotating schedule. C) easier amend process
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
can you think of a constitutional court with a similarly outsized role? (Admittedly in many role split btwn national ct & echr)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and it's way too polarized along partisan lines.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Curious as to your thoughts about which Federal institutions could use MORE power to shore up checks and balances.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Especially w/ rising polarization, stakes of each vacancy r simply too high. Rs shameless enough 2 realize no penalty 4 obstrction
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And they're obsessed with interpreting the constitution as it was written. I prefer
's "living tree" principle -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Unlike executive power, SC power was mostly set in the first years of the Union.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@HeerJeet agreed and I'd add the executive has too much. Repeal the 17th and restore the Senate of the founders, and federalism.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.