Aside from the most hardened pacifists, everyone accepts political violence in some form. The only question is where the line is drawn.
-
-
how about tactics where you don't drop bombs on people's heads in other countries?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If we can't rely on the state to punch Nazis for us, what good is that monopoly?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In some contexts, violent protests --> backlash (http://www.omarwasow.com/Protests_on_Voting.pdf …); in others, --> liberal shifts (http://people.hmdc.harvard.edu/~renos/papers/EnosKaufmanSands/EnosKaufmanSands.pdf …)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's also not just violence in theory, but does small group choose violence in defiance of wishes of supposed political allies.
-
New conversation -
-
-
"absolute"? Even in cases of self-defense?
-
That's a case-by-case exemption state allows. But each case has to be investigated & state has final say if legal.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
your military is private, ur churches are exclusive and your gov't is secretive. Thats a monopoly if im not mistaken is it not?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How about we grant the Nazis a monopsony on violence?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Twitter seems like a really good place 2 outline a theory of political violence.
-
Not my theory! Max Weber.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.