The evidence lined up didn't do much to support the bold conclusion, frankly.
-
-
-
The author misrepresents media 'facts' as things Snowden claimed, then invents, from whole cloth, counter-facts.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
A lot of evidence that Russia saw Snowden as useful (duh) but little that he was some sort of double-agent.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is that supposed to be Michael Tracey?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is he the one who wrote that horrible NYRB piece on Strauss-Kahn?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Snowden@bartongellman I like this tweet but using i.e. instead of e.g. is making my eye twitch.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I miss writing so much
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The terrible WSJ article gave itself away early. I stopped reading, asking myself only, Why did I read anything in WSJ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Snowden@bartongellman That will be interesting.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.