1. The problem here is seeing this as an either/or. EITHER Russians/Comey cost election OR Clinton ran bad campaign. But both could be true https://twitter.com/KFILE/status/809982925144027136 …
-
-
65 Million knew exactly what Donald Trump is & voted for him to be the President. China, Hacking, Misspelling. They wanted it all
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it's hard to focus on policies when he doesn't actually present any.
-
You can talk about how your policies will help people, create jobs, etc. Ignore his antics.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Seriously? He had no policies. How do you recommend focusing on that?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
4. By making election about contrast of character, Clinton made salience of email leaks & Comey letters more important.
-
the Cs gave T cover on all points; greed, corruption, lechery,racist policy, honestly no one could get a clear shot at him
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@HeerJeet She had no policies of her own; she stood for everything and it's opposite depending who was in from of her. Worst fraud ever! -
you are confusing the candidates.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
nah...she ran a good campaign. She was up against a perceived race takeover and that motivated white folks esp women to come out
-
10,000 visits to Wisconsin wasn't gonna fix race problem imo
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.