2. EC was created before US had political parties. But parties now exist & Electors are partisans. So very unlikely they will reject Trump
-
-
-
even if it throws election to republican House? And they end up with a diff republican - one who will actually work with them?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not to interrupt, and I agree with you and had already dismissed the EC route. But what about 1p1v trying to use Bush v Gore 2000?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it's not dangerous. but probably less than likely.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think that there's a faction within the establishment that is trying to do this by raising the spectre of foreign influence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dangerous in what way?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, it's dangerous. More dangerous than Trump being president though? We're weighing which shit sandwich to eat here.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
there is always a first time for everything.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
these violent delights have violent ends
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only solution I see is for GOP electors to suggest a Republican and the Democrats support him. It would isolate Trumpkins at least
-
it's a good idea. But republicans picked trump through primary knowing what he was. So not fair to pick new guy now.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.