3. Roosevelt's shift was broad & had USA assume role previously performed by the British as the bulwark of global liberal capitalism.
-
-
I think they'll end up looking like the Bushies, only without any pretense of democracy promotion. 1:3 odds of a war with Iran.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't think the thread ends quite right. TAC and paleos favor restraint. Trump doesn't want restraint. He wants to be unbound.
-
That does stand in opposition to alliances. But he may go for something in the middle: variation on W's coalitions of the willing
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't think Trump has a coherent policy. He wants *more* involvement in some regions (Isis, Syria).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
but in the meantime, what if Russia or China decide they no longer are constrained by USA underwritten order?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Neocons believe in regime change to democritize societies. Trump's militarists want to use hard power to change behaviors.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But your larger point may be right. After a war though (size to be determined)
-
Which is why the deep state doesn't care as much as you think. This is within the spectrum. Bolton is the IR id not Buchanan
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Trump (Flynn, Mattis, Pompeo) want to use military to roll back Iran influence in region. Accuse Obama of softness. Here 1st shift
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.