3. What Karp shows is that slaveholding class (and their vision of the world) dominated USA foreign policy in antebellum America.
-
-
15. IR as a discipline is notoriously loathe to connect domestic nature of regimes with foreign policy, but here's a place to start. The end
-
16. PS. You can hear
@karpmj talk about his book in latest@CHAPOTRAPHOUSEhttps://soundcloud.com/chapo-trap-house/episode-50-akp-50th-episode-ergenekon-extravaganza-101716 … - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Scientific racists had less and less influence over foreign policy post-Civil War, and always tended to be less interventionist...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and less imperialist/colonialist than the racial liberals who actually dominated FP in the 20th century.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Old-school racists tended to want to avoid contact with inferior races, hence many opposed Philippines occupation, etc.
-
Old-school racists like Wilson, Bryan, etc, right?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Whereas progressives believed that dark-skinned people across the world could and *should* be uplifted and re-made in "our" image.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That is, all the major imperialist campaigns of the US have been led by opponents of the scientific racism of Calhoun and co.
-
what about Albert Beveridge
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Kennan is a good case in point. Containment, which required no occupations or colonizations, was overthrown . . .
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.