I don't think presidential wariness of the phrase reflects trickery. But I it's a problem when that wariness gets bound up ...
-
-
Replying to @DouthatNYT @normative
... in a broader effort to downplay fairly obvious ideological motives in terror.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @DouthatNYT @normative
I think there is genuine ambiguity in mentally ill lone wolves radicalized online
5 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
meanwhile, US hawks downplay fact that virtually all these guys (as here) cite US wars as motivating factor
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
The Republican nominee opposes all those wars, though.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
if you're looking for a liberal who will defend HRC's foreign policy, you're looking at the wrong guy.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
And neither am I arguing that the proper response to jihadi terror is permanent occupation of the ME.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
right. but you see more causal power in ideology (jihadism) per se, whereas I see it as more epiphenomenal
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think it's epiphenomenal of a lot of things, w/US FP one of them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
agreed.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I also agree
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.